<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Folksonomy versus Taxonomy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sethearley.wordpress.com/2007/02/15/folksonomy-versus-taxonomy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sethearley.wordpress.com/2007/02/15/folksonomy-versus-taxonomy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:18:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ECMInsight &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Taxonomy versus Folksonomy</title>
		<link>http://sethearley.wordpress.com/2007/02/15/folksonomy-versus-taxonomy/#comment-3134</link>
		<dc:creator>ECMInsight &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Taxonomy versus Folksonomy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 05:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sethearley.wordpress.com/2007/02/15/folksonomy-versus-taxonomy/#comment-3134</guid>
		<description>[...] Not Otherwise Categorized [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Not Otherwise Categorized [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John McGuire</title>
		<link>http://sethearley.wordpress.com/2007/02/15/folksonomy-versus-taxonomy/#comment-1333</link>
		<dc:creator>John McGuire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sethearley.wordpress.com/2007/02/15/folksonomy-versus-taxonomy/#comment-1333</guid>
		<description>Great Post! 
I have always belived that a good Taxonamy takes into account the words users understand and doesn&#039;t focus on words users use.  In general, users understand more descriptive and specific words then they will use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Post!<br />
I have always belived that a good Taxonamy takes into account the words users understand and doesn&#8217;t focus on words users use.  In general, users understand more descriptive and specific words then they will use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Folksonomy versus Taxonomy &#171; Meaningful Data</title>
		<link>http://sethearley.wordpress.com/2007/02/15/folksonomy-versus-taxonomy/#comment-805</link>
		<dc:creator>Folksonomy versus Taxonomy &#171; Meaningful Data</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 17:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sethearley.wordpress.com/2007/02/15/folksonomy-versus-taxonomy/#comment-805</guid>
		<description>[...] an interesting post on a topic I&#8217;ve been thinking about lately, the relative merits of Folksonomy versus Taxonomy. I agree with the points he&#8217;s making, though I think there&#8217;s room to go a little deeper [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an interesting post on a topic I&#8217;ve been thinking about lately, the relative merits of Folksonomy versus Taxonomy. I agree with the points he&#8217;s making, though I think there&#8217;s room to go a little deeper [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faceted Folksonomies or Web 2.2 &#171; Library Science and the World Around Us</title>
		<link>http://sethearley.wordpress.com/2007/02/15/folksonomy-versus-taxonomy/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>Faceted Folksonomies or Web 2.2 &#171; Library Science and the World Around Us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 17:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sethearley.wordpress.com/2007/02/15/folksonomy-versus-taxonomy/#comment-188</guid>
		<description>[...] about implementing rudimentary controls upon the world of folksonomies.  Seth Earley, in his blog Not Otherwise Categorized, proposed the concept of a hybrid system.  In his method, new terms would be vetted by review much [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about implementing rudimentary controls upon the world of folksonomies.  Seth Earley, in his blog Not Otherwise Categorized, proposed the concept of a hybrid system.  In his method, new terms would be vetted by review much [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
